logical problem of evil造句

Critics have noted that theodicies and defenses are often addressed to the logical problem of evil.
Defenses propose solutions to the logical problem of evil, while theodicies attempt to answer the evident problem.
The problem of evil is often formulated in two forms : the logical problem of evil and the evidential problem of evil.
Plantinga's argument is a defense against the logical problem of evil as formulated by philosopher J . L . Mackie beginning in 1955.
Mackie's formulation of the logical problem of evil argued that three attributes of God, omniscience, omnipotence, and omnibenevolence, in orthodox Christian theism are logically incompatible with the existence of evil.
It's difficult to find logical problem of evil in a sentence. 用logical problem of evil造句挺难的

Most scholars agree that Plantinga's free will of human and non-human spirits ( demons ) argument successfully solves the logical problem of evil, proving that God and evil are logically compatible but other scholars explicitly dissent.
Generally, a " defense " against the problem of evil may refer to attempts to defuse the logical problem of evil by showing that there is no logical incompatibility between the existence of evil and the existence of God.
Polymath Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and poet Alexander Pope were both famous for developing a system of thought known as philosophical optimism in an attempt to reconcile a loving Christian God with the logical problem of evil ( made evident in disasters such as Lisbon ).
Plantinga did not claim to have shown that the conclusion of the logical problem is wrong, nor did he assert that God's reason for allowing evil is, in fact, to preserve free will . instead, his argument sought only to show that the logical problem of evil was unsound.